Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:47:21 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Johan Henriksson <jhe AT realsoftware DOT cjb DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: What does this mean?
In-Reply-To: <02a901c09b7c$92b8abc0$6300a8c0@brk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010221114701.18287L-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Johan Henriksson wrote:

> switch(val)
>  { case 1: return(2);
>    case 2: return(3);
>    default: return(5);
>  }
> }
> 
> I'm not sure but I think this is one of the codesnippets that fool's GCC.

Did you try this?  I don't think GCC will emit a warning for this
code.  It might print a warning if there's no `default' clause,
though.