Message-ID:	<20010208150220.697.qmail@lauras.lt>
From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:02:20 +0200
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Win2k vs Win NT4
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010207153830 DOT 4599Y-100000 AT is> <95rsjd$lfl$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To:	<95rsjd$lfl$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>; from eplmst@lu.erisoft.se on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:19:57PM +0000
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:19:57PM +0000, Martin Stromberg wrote:
> Perhaps having the user "set WIN2000=1" or something similar would be
> acceptable? The user should know if he's running WINDOZE 2000 or not,
> right?

But this is one of the most unreliable ways, isn't it?

Laurynas

- Raw text -