Message-ID: <20010208150220.697.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:02:20 +0200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Win2k vs Win NT4
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010207153830 DOT 4599Y-100000 AT is> <95rsjd$lfl$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <95rsjd$lfl$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>; from eplmst@lu.erisoft.se on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:19:57PM +0000
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 04:19:57PM +0000, Martin Stromberg wrote:
> Perhaps having the user "set WIN2000=1" or something similar would be
> acceptable? The user should know if he's running WINDOZE 2000 or not,
> right?

But this is one of the most unreliable ways, isn't it?

Laurynas