Date:	Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:44:03 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Function and File ordering and speed optimization
In-Reply-To:	<95poaj$jc2$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010207084050.2148N-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 6 Feb 2001, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> Steamer <dontmailme AT iname DOT com> wrote:
> > The profiler doesn't tell you how to order the functions.
> 
> You haven't seen all of gprof, yet.  It does offer such an ordering, as
> one possible alternative output.
> 
> gprof is notoriously incompletely documented

Actually, I think the current versions of gprof.info are quite good.  
This particular option is --function-order, and is documented in the 
manual quite clearly.

- Raw text -