Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:44:03 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Function and File ordering and speed optimization
In-Reply-To: <95poaj$jc2$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010207084050.2148N-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On 6 Feb 2001, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> Steamer <dontmailme AT iname DOT com> wrote:
> > The profiler doesn't tell you how to order the functions.
> 
> You haven't seen all of gprof, yet.  It does offer such an ordering, as
> one possible alternative output.
> 
> gprof is notoriously incompletely documented

Actually, I think the current versions of gprof.info are quite good.  
This particular option is --function-order, and is documented in the 
manual quite clearly.