Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/10/22/08:10:40
From: | Daniel Barker <sokal AT holyrood DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Partial upgrade from 2.02 to 2.03?
|
Date: | Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:17:02 +0100
|
Organization: | Edinburgh University
|
Lines: | 38
|
Message-ID: | <Pine.GSO.4.10.10010221212000.11888-100000@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | holyrood.ed.ac.uk
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Trace: | scotsman.ed.ac.uk 972213424 7932 129.215.16.14 (22 Oct 2000 11:17:04 GMT)
|
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT scotsman DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk
|
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 22 Oct 2000 11:17:04 GMT
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
Some time ago, I installed many DJGPP 2.02 packages. I now wish to upgrade
my compilers and related packages, as follows:
from bnu281b.zip to bnu2951b.zip;
from djdev202.zip to djdev203.zip;
from gcc281b.zip to gcc2952b.zip;
from g770523b.zip to g772952b.zip.
Of the other DJGPP packages I currently have installed, the following
are less recent than the latest "*b.zip" versions on the nearest DJGPP
FTP mirror site. Might the above upgrades cause trouble for them?
bc103b.zip
bsh1147b.zip
bsn125b.zip
dif271b.zip
ed-02b.zip
find41b.zip
flx254b.zip
grep22b.zip
gro110b.zip
gwk303b.zip
gzp124b.zip
lss332b.zip
mak377b.zip
man12b.zip
pat25b.zip
shl112b.zip
txt122b.zip
My feeling is that, since these are not part of the C or FORTRAN
compilation system, they should continue to work correctly after upgrading
bnu, djdev, gcc and g77. However, perhaps there are some subtle
dependencies I do not know about. Any advice would be welcome.
--
Daniel Barker.
- Raw text -