From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: delete OR delete[] ?
Date:	18 Aug 2000 11:26:17 GMT
Organization:	Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<8nj6gp$buv$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References:	<8ngta8$27b$2 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> <399c05a2$1_1 AT news DOT uni-bielefeld DOT de> <8nh5qk$h21$2 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 966597977 12255 137.226.32.75 (18 Aug 2000 11:26:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	18 Aug 2000 11:26:17 GMT
Originator:	broeker@
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Rafał Maj" <r_maj AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl> wrote:

> I asked this question because I think, that ther was a bug in C++ book, from
> witch I was learning.

Please note that there are lots of outright incorrect books on C++
floating around in book stores. The language has been in a constantly
changing state, for about 5 years, but the compiler makers and book
editors felt they couldn't wait until it settled down before writing
books like 'teach yourself C++ in 24 hours'.  They usually don't even
_mention_ what version of C++ they might be referring to, other than
by claiming compatibility to some compiler version.

Bad books like those do the general public a misservice, but that's
never stopped anyone from making his profits, has it?
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -