Date:	Thu, 18 May 2000 18:40:36 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: size_t
In-Reply-To:	<3923FDDD.2186F25@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000518183831.15189R-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> But does that mean we read books which teach us to
> make buggy programs? There usually used "int" and "long int" instead of
> "size_t" and "fpos_t".

Yes, these books make you a disservice.

(I assume you meant to say off_t, not fpos_t, because the latter is not 
usually replaced with a long.)

- Raw text -