Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 18:40:36 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: size_t
In-Reply-To: <3923FDDD.2186F25@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000518183831.15189R-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> But does that mean we read books which teach us to
> make buggy programs? There usually used "int" and "long int" instead of
> "size_t" and "fpos_t".

Yes, these books make you a disservice.

(I assume you meant to say off_t, not fpos_t, because the latter is not 
usually replaced with a long.)