From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inline asm problem
Date:	Sat, 06 May 2000 22:50:52 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<3914698C.C93ED6D1@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<007f01bfb76e$0020d320$2f5293c3 AT pkcrone> <8f1t7r DOT 3vs63bt DOT 0 AT buerssner-17104 DOT user DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp97-1.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 957645903 60639 212.188.97.1 (6 May 2000 20:45:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	6 May 2000 20:45:03 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	ru,en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dieter Buerssner wrote:
> 
> There is a change in the handling of inline assembly in recent
> versions of gcc. You are not allowed anymore, to put registers
> in the input-list into the clobber list

I noticed that... But should I just leave it as is or I need to redesign
inline ASM? You might already answered this question, but I was not
concerned about inline ASM then. Please remide me. :)

thanks.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -