From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: inline asm problem
Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 22:50:52 +0400
Organization: MTU-Intel ISP
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <3914698C.C93ED6D1@mtu-net.ru>
References: <007f01bfb76e$0020d320$2f5293c3 AT pkcrone> <8f1t7r DOT 3vs63bt DOT 0 AT buerssner-17104 DOT user DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp97-1.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 957645903 60639 212.188.97.1 (6 May 2000 20:45:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 May 2000 20:45:03 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dieter Buerssner wrote:
> 
> There is a change in the handling of inline assembly in recent
> versions of gcc. You are not allowed anymore, to put registers
> in the input-list into the clobber list

I noticed that... But should I just leave it as is or I need to redesign
inline ASM? You might already answered this question, but I was not
concerned about inline ASM then. Please remide me. :)

thanks.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru