Date:	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 04:57:54 +0600 (LKT)
From:	Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender:	root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net
To:	Glenn Randers-Pehrson <randeg AT alum DOT rpi DOT edu>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: help with a bit stream....
In-Reply-To:	<8cd0vn$25h$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10004050456310.1259-100000@darkstar.grendel.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote:

> In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004040529340.1275-
> 100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net>,
>   djgpp AT delorie DOT com wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote:
> >
> > > Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know that GIF's suck etc..But the problem is that animated
> > > > GIF's are a great thing [...]
> > > Well, you could invent 'animated PNG' format, then add the
> > > code to the mozilla project along with transparent PNG support.
> 
> It's already invented.  The spec is here:
> http://www.cdrom.com/pub/mng/

At last..Thanks, IMHO this is a good thing (tm). Once there is widespread
support
for animated PNG's then there would be nothing at all for users or
developers to use those GIF's... :-)

Grendel

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -