Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 04:57:54 +0600 (LKT) From: Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel X-Sender: root AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net To: Glenn Randers-Pehrson cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: help with a bit stream.... In-Reply-To: <8cd0vn$25h$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Glenn Randers-Pehrson wrote: > In article 100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net>, > djgpp AT delorie DOT com wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote: > > > > > Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote: > > > > > > > I know that GIF's suck etc..But the problem is that animated > > > > GIF's are a great thing [...] > > > Well, you could invent 'animated PNG' format, then add the > > > code to the mozilla project along with transparent PNG support. > > It's already invented. The spec is here: > http://www.cdrom.com/pub/mng/ At last..Thanks, IMHO this is a good thing (tm). Once there is widespread support for animated PNG's then there would be nothing at all for users or developers to use those GIF's... :-) Grendel Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread :)