Date:	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:21:59 +0500 (MVT)
From:	Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
X-Sender:	prashant_tr AT midpec DOT com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Win 2000 & Djgpp
In-Reply-To:	<e2iuasshlp5thrg1ttj2ripvn3k47suh1r@4ax.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10002201819510.746-100000@midpec.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 23:43:01 +0500 (MVT), Prashant TR
> <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
> 
> >Any kernel version that is odd (such as 2.1.x, 2.3.x, etc.) are
> >all unstable. I think you should have been aware of that.  That's
> >exactly why Red Hat ships only even versions of the kernels.
> 
> However, later odd kernels are often more stable than Windows.
> Linus just has higher standards than Bill.

He he. True. ;-).

> >But this is getting off-topic. I think we should stop this thread.
> 
> To what comp.os.linux.* group should I crosspost and set followups
> next time something like this pops up?

Don't know. There are some mailing lists, however, at vger.rutgers.edu. I
used to be in the linux-kernel mailing list earlier. There are several
mailing lists there. So maybe sending a mail to
majordomo AT vger DOT rutgers DOT edu with the command "lists" should help.

- Raw text -