Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:21:59 +0500 (MVT) From: Prashant TR X-Sender: prashant_tr AT midpec DOT com To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Win 2000 & Djgpp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote: > On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 23:43:01 +0500 (MVT), Prashant TR > wrote: > > >Any kernel version that is odd (such as 2.1.x, 2.3.x, etc.) are > >all unstable. I think you should have been aware of that. That's > >exactly why Red Hat ships only even versions of the kernels. > > However, later odd kernels are often more stable than Windows. > Linus just has higher standards than Bill. He he. True. ;-). > >But this is getting off-topic. I think we should stop this thread. > > To what comp.os.linux.* group should I crosspost and set followups > next time something like this pops up? Don't know. There are some mailing lists, however, at vger.rutgers.edu. I used to be in the linux-kernel mailing list earlier. There are several mailing lists there. So maybe sending a mail to majordomo AT vger DOT rutgers DOT edu with the command "lists" should help.