From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: What is a good DJGPP editor?
Date:	Thu, 07 Oct 1999 20:27:04 -0700
Organization:	Harvey Mudd College
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<37FD6488.35E50FD1@hmc.edu>
References:	<7tjk6o$10v$1 AT pumpkin DOT pangea DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 939353260 99249 134.173.45.219 (8 Oct 1999 03:27:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	8 Oct 1999 03:27:40 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13pre12 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

electr1k wrote:
> 
> what is a good editor for djgpp? i'm switching from borland to djgpp (i
> still have to use borland for school though), so i'm wondering two things:
> 1. what is a good editor?

If you liked Borland's editor, you'll probably like RHIDE.  It's
available with the rest of DJGPP.  (To forestall another post: if you
have problems with an error about "-lstdcx", see FAQ section 8.7.)

I personally like Emacs, though it does have a bit of a learning curve.

> 2. is it worth making the switch from borland to djgpp?

You've come to the wrong place for an unbiased opinion :)  But IMHO,
yes, absolutely.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -