From: Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: What is a good DJGPP editor?
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 20:27:04 -0700
Organization: Harvey Mudd College
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <37FD6488.35E50FD1@hmc.edu>
References: <7tjk6o$10v$1 AT pumpkin DOT pangea DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: nntp1.interworld.net 939353260 99249 134.173.45.219 (8 Oct 1999 03:27:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Oct 1999 03:27:40 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13pre12 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

electr1k wrote:
> 
> what is a good editor for djgpp? i'm switching from borland to djgpp (i
> still have to use borland for school though), so i'm wondering two things:
> 1. what is a good editor?

If you liked Borland's editor, you'll probably like RHIDE.  It's
available with the rest of DJGPP.  (To forestall another post: if you
have problems with an error about "-lstdcx", see FAQ section 8.7.)

I personally like Emacs, though it does have a bit of a learning curve.

> 2. is it worth making the switch from borland to djgpp?

You've come to the wrong place for an unbiased opinion :)  But IMHO,
yes, absolutely.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu