From:	Clemens Valens <c DOT valensNOc DOT SPAM AT mindless DOT com DOT invalid>
Subject:	Re: independent jpeg group library problem
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Message-ID:	<0c2b02cf.bbe863c1@usw-ex0108-059.remarq.com>
Lines:	19
Bytes:	811
X-Originating-Host:	195.154.148.69
Organization:	http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
References:	<000b8d9b DOT f8dd8b66 AT usw-ex0101-003 DOT remarq DOT com>
X-Wren-Trace:	eAEkDA0UUxlSQlsfBU0FBgAyHA0KAU0SFx5AAQcYWBBXUg9RWhVaXllYS1JW
Date:	Fri, 01 Oct 1999 01:06:01 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host:	10.0.2.59
X-Complaints-To:	wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com
X-Trace:	WReNphoon3 938765166 10.0.2.59 (Fri, 01 Oct 1999 01:06:06 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 01 Oct 1999 01:06:06 PDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Follow up...

I rebuild the library this morning on another machine with
the same DJGPP installation. I had the same warnings (I 've
used gcc295b), but the tests were correct this time! When I
looked at the test *INPUT* images (with the same viewer as
on the other machine), it turned out that they are *ALL* of
red roses, there is *NO* input image of a green rose! On
the other machine I had a green one! Therefore, it must be
a problem of the system reading certain types of files
(binary vs text as djdelorie suggested?). Strange, because
I've never had any problems like this before (anyway, never
noticed anything strange before).

Clemens


* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

- Raw text -