From:	digana AT t-online DOT de (Sascha Bendinger)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: watcom c/c++ vs djgpp?
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:49:38 GMT
Organization:	digana EDV-Unternehmensberatung
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<37f1f387.8505605@news.btx.dtag.de>
References:	<TEfI3.1901$E7 DOT 44428 AT news2 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <938582798 DOT 1944148164 AT news DOT efortress DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news05.btx.dtag.de 938605852 1910 06353989218-0001 990929 11:50:52
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT t-online DOT de
X-Sender:	06353989218-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:24:36 -0600, Ishpeck <ishpeck AT crosswinds DOT net>
wrote:

>but Watcom is a very powerful compiler.  It all depends on what you're looking
>for.  Watcom's got glories like Multitargetability, and commercial support.... 

Not any more, it has been shelfed by Powersoft and isn't neither
developed nor sold anymore!

Bye, Sascha

- Raw text -