From: digana AT t-online DOT de (Sascha Bendinger)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: watcom c/c++ vs djgpp?
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:49:38 GMT
Organization: digana EDV-Unternehmensberatung
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <37f1f387.8505605@news.btx.dtag.de>
References: <TEfI3.1901$E7 DOT 44428 AT news2 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <938582798 DOT 1944148164 AT news DOT efortress DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news05.btx.dtag.de 938605852 1910 06353989218-0001 990929 11:50:52
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT t-online DOT de
X-Sender: 06353989218-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 23:24:36 -0600, Ishpeck <ishpeck AT crosswinds DOT net>
wrote:

>but Watcom is a very powerful compiler.  It all depends on what you're looking
>for.  Watcom's got glories like Multitargetability, and commercial support.... 

Not any more, it has been shelfed by Powersoft and isn't neither
developed nor sold anymore!

Bye, Sascha