From:	"Oliver Roese" <oroese AT edina DOT xnc DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<7qtv03$ck$1 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Assembly in DJGPP (MMX etc)
Date:	Sun, 5 Sep 1999 21:32:23 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pm1-120.xnc.de
Message-ID:	<37d2cae9@news.xenologics.com>
X-Trace:	5 Sep 1999 21:56:25 +0100, pm1-120.xnc.de
Organization:	.XNC GmbH
Lines:	14
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Duncan Coutts <Duncan DOT Coutts AT dial DOT pipex DOT com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
7qtv03$ck$1 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net...
> I know the standard gcc inline assembler uses the AT&T syntax rather than
> the more common intel notation. I suspect (but an no sure) that the inline
> assembler is not very recent and does not support new instructions eg MMX,
> P6 or 3DNOW (I noticed that it doesn't even support segment override
> prefixes! - see farptr.h).

binutils 2.9 do support mmx instructions.
I havent tried 3DNow instructions.

Oliver Roese

- Raw text -