From: "Oliver Roese" <oroese AT edina DOT xnc DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <7qtv03$ck$1 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net>
Subject: Re: Assembly in DJGPP (MMX etc)
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 21:32:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm1-120.xnc.de
Message-ID: <37d2cae9@news.xenologics.com>
X-Trace: 5 Sep 1999 21:56:25 +0100, pm1-120.xnc.de
Organization: .XNC GmbH
Lines: 14
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


Duncan Coutts <Duncan DOT Coutts AT dial DOT pipex DOT com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
7qtv03$ck$1 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net...
> I know the standard gcc inline assembler uses the AT&T syntax rather than
> the more common intel notation. I suspect (but an no sure) that the inline
> assembler is not very recent and does not support new instructions eg MMX,
> P6 or 3DNOW (I noticed that it doesn't even support segment override
> prefixes! - see farptr.h).

binutils 2.9 do support mmx instructions.
I havent tried 3DNow instructions.

Oliver Roese