From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Solved! (Re: Pentium "General Protection Fault")
Date:	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:49:22 +0300
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990902134814.14737I-100000@is>
References:	<7qhbnp$3rp$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7qja6k$gi4$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7qjgcl$hmt$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7ql0qv$55i$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 936269291 2576 199.203.121.2 (2 Sep 1999 10:48:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	2 Sep 1999 10:48:11 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<7ql0qv$55i$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Damian Yerrick wrote:

> DJ, another solution is for the next DJGPP release's malloc()
> to keep its freelist in some global upon which the average
> programmer is not likely to stumble:

As I already wrote elsewhere, this problem is solved in the development 
sources (all variables are now static), so v2.03 doesn't have this 
trouble.

- Raw text -