From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Solved! (Re: Pentium "General Protection Fault")
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:49:22 +0300
Organization: NetVision Israel	
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990902134814.14737I-100000@is>
References: <7qhbnp$3rp$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7qja6k$gi4$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7qjgcl$hmt$1 AT samba DOT rahul DOT net> <7ql0qv$55i$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 936269291 2576 199.203.121.2 (2 Sep 1999 10:48:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Sep 1999 10:48:11 GMT
X-Sender: eliz AT is
In-Reply-To: <7ql0qv$55i$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Damian Yerrick wrote:

> DJ, another solution is for the next DJGPP release's malloc()
> to keep its freelist in some global upon which the average
> programmer is not likely to stumble:

As I already wrote elsewhere, this problem is solved in the development 
sources (all variables are now static), so v2.03 doesn't have this 
trouble.