From:	"sl" <sl AT psycode DOT com DOT REMOVE_THIS>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: I'm happy with DJGPP v2.02
Date:	Sat, 19 Dec 1998 23:22:22 -0500 (EST)
Organization:	Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<fycflpbqrpbz.f48xha0.pminews@nntp.generation.net>
References:	<36794EFE DOT DF9 AT teleline DOT es>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	205.205.118.208
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	914127008 ZCZSLWF4G76D0CDCDC usenet77.supernews.com
X-Complaints-To:	newsabuse AT remarQ DOT com
X-Newsreader:	PMINews 2.00.1205 For OS/2
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id XAB17710
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 19:35:42 +0100, Mariano Alvarez Fernández wrote:

>DJ wrote:
>
>> > >At last (using DJGPP v2.02) the 32 bit version of my data-base app
>> > >run as fast as the 16 bit version, and now I can use a lot of 
>> > >memory.
>
>>I think that means that the *speed* of 2.02 is a lot faster than 2.01,
>>which certainly is true for stdio file I/O.
>
>Yes, it means that. And the 16 bit version was compiled with BC.

	I'm confused.. If all DJGPP stuff is 32-bit, what 16-bit version are
you talking about?!

Gili

- Raw text -