From: "sl" <sl AT psycode DOT com DOT REMOVE_THIS>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: I'm happy with DJGPP v2.02
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 23:22:22 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <fycflpbqrpbz.f48xha0.pminews@nntp.generation.net>
References: <36794EFE DOT DF9 AT teleline DOT es>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.205.118.208
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: 914127008 ZCZSLWF4G76D0CDCDC usenet77.supernews.com
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse AT remarQ DOT com
X-Newsreader: PMINews 2.00.1205 For OS/2
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id XAB17710
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 19:35:42 +0100, Mariano Alvarez Fernández wrote:

>DJ wrote:
>
>> > >At last (using DJGPP v2.02) the 32 bit version of my data-base app
>> > >run as fast as the 16 bit version, and now I can use a lot of 
>> > >memory.
>
>>I think that means that the *speed* of 2.02 is a lot faster than 2.01,
>>which certainly is true for stdio file I/O.
>
>Yes, it means that. And the 16 bit version was compiled with BC.

	I'm confused.. If all DJGPP stuff is 32-bit, what 16-bit version are
you talking about?!

Gili