From:	Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Extended Inline Assembly Help
Date:	Sun, 09 Aug 1998 20:33:09 -0300
Organization:	NBTel Internet
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<35CE31B4.6E81FE96@unb.ca>
References:	<199808082021 DOT VAA24824 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <902615331 DOT 608967 AT samba DOT news DOT big-orange DOT net>
	<35CDE597 DOT 9FBD6EBE AT unb DOT ca> <19980809 DOT 181823 DOT 4382 DOT 0 DOT zixyer AT juno DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	fctnts10c73.nbnet.nb.ca
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Zixyer S Qwerty wrote:

> >asm ("movl $0x13, %%eax; int $0x10"::"eax");
> >
> It works because if there isn't a protected mode interrupt installed
> it'll go right to
> the real mode one, so normal "int" instructions would work.

    Is it faster to use 'int' instead of __dpmi_int ?

--
     (\/) Endlisnis (\/)
          s257m AT unb DOT ca
          Endlisnis AT GeoCities DOT com
          Endlis AT nbnet DOT nb DOT ca

- Raw text -