From: Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Extended Inline Assembly Help
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1998 20:33:09 -0300
Organization: NBTel Internet
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <35CE31B4.6E81FE96@unb.ca>
References: <199808082021 DOT VAA24824 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <902615331 DOT 608967 AT samba DOT news DOT big-orange DOT net>
		<35CDE597 DOT 9FBD6EBE AT unb DOT ca> <19980809 DOT 181823 DOT 4382 DOT 0 DOT zixyer AT juno DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fctnts10c73.nbnet.nb.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Zixyer S Qwerty wrote:

> >asm ("movl $0x13, %%eax; int $0x10"::"eax");
> >
> It works because if there isn't a protected mode interrupt installed
> it'll go right to
> the real mode one, so normal "int" instructions would work.

    Is it faster to use 'int' instead of __dpmi_int ?

--
     (\/) Endlisnis (\/)
          s257m AT unb DOT ca
          Endlisnis AT GeoCities DOT com
          Endlis AT nbnet DOT nb DOT ca