From:	Oliver Batchelor <batch AT netaccess DOT co DOT nz>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: 16 bit colour !! with dgjpp
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 18:00:48 +1200
Organization:	The World's Usenet -- http://www.Supernews.com
Lines:	11
Message-ID:	<35972D90.3B2009D3@netaccess.co.nz>
References:	<3595DCCA DOT 8DA7608D AT netaccess DOT co DOT nz> <bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-didqDIr5K8DV AT portC69 DOT Generation DOT NET>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	203.98.5.191
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>         Umm.. I've been using PASCAL for 6 years and I can tell you
> right
> now: PASCAL and C don't differ in speeds. You can (and should) use
> nested ASM commands in both languages and as such the results are the
> same.

You are probably correct, but from what I have been using in pascal for
the last couple of years is slower than everything I have found for C
(turbo C 2.0, with a really bad IDE).

- Raw text -