From: Oliver Batchelor <batch AT netaccess DOT co DOT nz>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: 16 bit colour !! with dgjpp
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 18:00:48 +1200
Organization: The World's Usenet -- http://www.Supernews.com
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <35972D90.3B2009D3@netaccess.co.nz>
References: <3595DCCA DOT 8DA7608D AT netaccess DOT co DOT nz> <bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-didqDIr5K8DV AT portC69 DOT Generation DOT NET>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.98.5.191
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

>         Umm.. I've been using PASCAL for 6 years and I can tell you
> right
> now: PASCAL and C don't differ in speeds. You can (and should) use
> nested ASM commands in both languages and as such the results are the
> same.

You are probably correct, but from what I have been using in pascal for
the last couple of years is slower than everything I have found for C
(turbo C 2.0, with a really bad IDE).