Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/10/28/06:15:34
Robert Hoehne wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Oct 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > And besides, you asked for a scenario where the order is significant,
> > and I provided such a scenario, which I met in real-life programs. I'm
>
> I know them also, but I thought that they are not so common.
>
> > RHIDE, but given that sometimes the order matters, isn't it best to
> > just prevent RHIDE from sorting in the first place?
>
> Maybe it's the best, but this would need much more work
> by me, because a sorted project can be handled much better
> than an unsorted :-(
>
> Maybe I will change that (at least as an option) in the future.
This might be a stupid proposal, but wouldn't it help already
if RHIDE's database of make rules would be extendible? This is
probably at least ignorant, because I haven't the slightest
idea _how_ it is done internally. But something similar to
the environment variables would be quite helpful.
--
Ciao
Tom
*************************************************************
* Thomas Demmer *
* Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik *
* Ruhr-Uni-Bochum *
* Universitaetsstr. 150 *
* D-44780 Bochum *
* Tel: +49 234 700 6434 *
* Fax: +49 234 709 4162 *
* http://www.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~demmer *
*************************************************************
- Raw text -