From: Thomas Demmer Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: RHIDE Question. Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 13:25:08 +0200 Organization: Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik Lines: 39 Message-ID: <34508594.30D49D89@LSTM.Ruhr-UNI-Bochum.De> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: c64.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Robert Hoehne wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Oct 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > And besides, you asked for a scenario where the order is significant, > > and I provided such a scenario, which I met in real-life programs. I'm > > I know them also, but I thought that they are not so common. > > > RHIDE, but given that sometimes the order matters, isn't it best to > > just prevent RHIDE from sorting in the first place? > > Maybe it's the best, but this would need much more work > by me, because a sorted project can be handled much better > than an unsorted :-( > > Maybe I will change that (at least as an option) in the future. This might be a stupid proposal, but wouldn't it help already if RHIDE's database of make rules would be extendible? This is probably at least ignorant, because I haven't the slightest idea _how_ it is done internally. But something similar to the environment variables would be quite helpful. -- Ciao Tom ************************************************************* * Thomas Demmer * * Lehrstuhl fuer Stroemungsmechanik * * Ruhr-Uni-Bochum * * Universitaetsstr. 150 * * D-44780 Bochum * * Tel: +49 234 700 6434 * * Fax: +49 234 709 4162 * * http://www.lstm.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~demmer * *************************************************************