From:	"A. Sinan Unur" <asu1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: *.C on Windows 95 (was: Stupid problem)
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 1997 10:04:39 -0400
Organization:	Cornell University http://www.cornell.edu
Lines:	19
Sender:	asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified)
Message-ID:	<34267AF7.B184BDD0@cornell.edu>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970922093824 DOT 11513A-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	asu1 AT cornell DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cu-dialup-0093.cit.cornell.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> But the same happens on plain DOS, I think.  `for' always expands the
> files in UPPER CASE on plain DOS, so this is actually something that 
> had no solution on DOS (except to not use `for' when compiling) and 
> Windows 95 have corrected this.  Am I missing something?

no you are not. it was just a remark. it's just that i had never used
batch files to compile before installing win 95, and i had not thought
about this before.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Sinan Unur
Department of Policy Analysis and Management, College of Human Ecology,
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

mailto:sinan DOT unur AT cornell DOT edu
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/asu1/

- Raw text -