From: "A. Sinan Unur" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: *.C on Windows 95 (was: Stupid problem) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 10:04:39 -0400 Organization: Cornell University http://www.cornell.edu Lines: 19 Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu (Verified) Message-ID: <34267AF7.B184BDD0@cornell.edu> References: Reply-To: asu1 AT cornell DOT edu NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0093.cit.cornell.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Eli Zaretskii wrote: > But the same happens on plain DOS, I think. `for' always expands the > files in UPPER CASE on plain DOS, so this is actually something that > had no solution on DOS (except to not use `for' when compiling) and > Windows 95 have corrected this. Am I missing something? no you are not. it was just a remark. it's just that i had never used batch files to compile before installing win 95, and i had not thought about this before. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Sinan Unur Department of Policy Analysis and Management, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA mailto:sinan DOT unur AT cornell DOT edu http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/asu1/