| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 1997 17:47:27 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| To: | Jason Barstow <jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk DOT removeme> |
| cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Function Sizes |
| In-Reply-To: | <33f9d88f.336368@news.eclipse.co.uk> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.970820174650.24006I-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Jason Barstow wrote: > I appreciate you are trying to discourage bad practise but > will you please summarise the *current* situation > (RE: Using an "empty" function to determine function end) > > Do any current optimisations break this method? I have never myself used this method extensively, but AFAIK, this works with the current version of GCC, including under optimizations.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |