Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 17:47:27 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Jason Barstow <jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk DOT removeme>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Function Sizes
In-Reply-To: <33f9d88f.336368@news.eclipse.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970820174650.24006I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Jason Barstow wrote:

> I appreciate you are trying to discourage bad practise but
> will you please summarise the *current* situation
> (RE: Using an "empty" function to determine function end)
> 
> Do any current optimisations break this method?

I have never myself used this method extensively, but AFAIK, this
works with the current version of GCC, including under optimizations.