delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Robert Hoehne <Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Which is better... EMACS or RHIDE? |
Date: | Mon, 04 Aug 1997 11:31:44 +0200 |
Organization: | TU Chemnitz-Zwickau |
Lines: | 30 |
Message-ID: | <33E5A180.3AE6380@Mathematik.TU-Chemnitz.DE> |
References: | <33DD805E DOT DF5783BC AT ix DOT netcom DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | pandora.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Perry Kaye wrote: > > Which is a better editor/development environment for DOS development. This depends hardly on what you want to do with it: If you want to do mostly anything on you computer with one program ==> get emacs if you need a tool for only developing programs without knowing so much about all the needed steps to build a program and the needed commandline syntax ===> get rhide And the best solution: Get both and try it for your own!! > Can > either of these products be used for professional development or should YES! Robert -- ***************************************************************** * Robert Hoehne, Fakultaet fuer Mathematik, TU-Chemnitz-Zwickau * * Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf * * e-Mail: Robert DOT Hoehne AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE * * WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~rho * *****************************************************************
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |