| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | lonniem AT cs DOT utexas DOT edu (Lonnie McCullough) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| Subject: | Re: Quake vs. Demos |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Jun 1997 02:33:12 GMT |
| Message-ID: | <339381de.7444776@news.nol.net> |
| References: | <422564AA DOT 004D330F DOT 00 AT aks DOT com> <19970602 DOT 143604 DOT 7119 DOT 3 DOT fwec AT juno DOT com> <33944C41 DOT 2F68 AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz> <33937d82 DOT 6327657 AT news DOT nol DOT net> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host: | ip39-40.nol.net |
| Lines: | 11 |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
>I don't know but to me it would seem like the compiler would be able >to resolve what function is being called in a virtual function at >compilation time. Why is this not the case? Nevermind I just realized. I've never really used virtual functions all that much but a few minutes on the toilet made me realize the answer to my own question. Lonnie McCullough lonniem AT cs DOT utexas DOT edu
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |