From: lonniem AT cs DOT utexas DOT edu (Lonnie McCullough)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Quake vs. Demos
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 02:33:12 GMT
Message-ID: <339381de.7444776@news.nol.net>
References: <422564AA DOT 004D330F DOT 00 AT aks DOT com> <19970602 DOT 143604 DOT 7119 DOT 3 DOT fwec AT juno DOT com> <33944C41 DOT 2F68 AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz> <33937d82 DOT 6327657 AT news DOT nol DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip39-40.nol.net
Lines: 11
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

>I don't know but to me it would seem like the compiler would be able
>to resolve what function is being called in a virtual function at
>compilation time.  Why is this not the case?

Nevermind I just realized.  I've never really used virtual functions
all that much but a few minutes on the toilet made me realize the
answer to my own question.


Lonnie McCullough
lonniem AT cs DOT utexas DOT edu