From:	Mark & Candice <mhewii AT concentric DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: assembler
Date:	Thu, 02 Jan 1997 14:45:43 -0500
Organization:	BRP
Lines:	8
Message-ID:	<32CC1067.62C7@concentric.net>
References:	<32C7CD0C DOT 5B96 AT netime DOT com>
Reply-To:	mhewii AT concentric DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cnc80632.concentric.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

derek greene wrote:
> 
> has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
> intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
> it for me and it is starting to piss me off

Why not use NASM to make functions .o ?
Its intell syntax... but you cant 'inline' with it.

- Raw text -