From: Mark & Candice <mhewii AT concentric DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: assembler
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 14:45:43 -0500
Organization: BRP
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <32CC1067.62C7@concentric.net>
References: <32C7CD0C DOT 5B96 AT netime DOT com>
Reply-To: mhewii AT concentric DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Host: cnc80632.concentric.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

derek greene wrote:
> 
> has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
> intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
> it for me and it is starting to piss me off

Why not use NASM to make functions .o ?
Its intell syntax... but you cant 'inline' with it.