Mail Archives: djgpp/1993/05/18/10:59:35
> Does this mean that the next release of gcc does not use those very long
> filenames that made it futile to port it to DOS? And that we get a new
> DJGPP when gcc 2.4 comes out?
gcc hasn't used dos-incompatible filenames since 2.2.2. 2.3.x had a
problem with "gcc a.c b.c" but otherwise worked fine. 2.4 is
buildable with djgpp as long as you fix up the "version=" line in the
makefile built by configure.bat (remove the ";). 2.4.1 will build
correctly with no modifications (I missed the 2.4 window due to mail
problems).
DJ
- Raw text -