Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<004f01c2460c$f0242e10$6132bc3e@BABEL>
From:	"Conrad Scott" <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20020816201318 DOT GA24942 AT redhat DOT com> <122196589420 DOT 20020817171040 AT gmx DOT net>
Subject:	Re: eliminated reliance on newlib malloc
Date:	Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:41:28 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I'm building a snapshot now.  I guess that will be the first
step
> in seeing just what I've broken.

If you're building on cygwin, I assume you'll have noticed that
sort(1) is now broken; it dies at malloc.cc:3644 in dlmalloc
(bytes=768).  (Sort is used in, at least, speclib, so that's why I
assume you would notice this problem if you build cygwin.)

On my machine this is an easy bug to reproduce: just running sort
with no arguments from the command line dies immediately.
Otherwise everything I'm using seems fine.

Cheers,

// Conrad

- Raw text -