Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <004f01c2460c$f0242e10$6132bc3e@BABEL> From: "Conrad Scott" To: References: <20020816201318 DOT GA24942 AT redhat DOT com> <122196589420 DOT 20020817171040 AT gmx DOT net> Subject: Re: eliminated reliance on newlib malloc Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:41:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I'm building a snapshot now. I guess that will be the first step > in seeing just what I've broken. If you're building on cygwin, I assume you'll have noticed that sort(1) is now broken; it dies at malloc.cc:3644 in dlmalloc (bytes=768). (Sort is used in, at least, speclib, so that's why I assume you would notice this problem if you build cygwin.) On my machine this is an easy bug to reproduce: just running sort with no arguments from the command line dies immediately. Otherwise everything I'm using seems fine. Cheers, // Conrad