Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<08cd01c143f0$09b16fc0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010922201928 DOT A21633 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: New getopt.c has different behavior -- should it?
Date:	Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:24:36 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	23 Sep 2001 05:32:37.0192 (UTC) FILETIME=[277F5480:01C143F1]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:19 AM
Subject: New getopt.c has different behavior -- should it?


> The new getopt.c that I just added to winsup/cygwin/lib exhibts
different,
> more GNU-like behavior when it parses arguments.
>
...
> So, the question is, which way *should* it be?  I'm inclined to leave
> it the way it is, since it seems to be more gnu-like but I don't
> want to cause people problems or generate unnecessary cygwin email
> traffic.

This is one of the GNUism's that I'm very neutral on. As for the mailing
list, I think we can count on one hand - in unary - the number of folk
that aren't on the dev list, that run strace. So I don't think there
will be much traffic :}. (That is, as long as we update the FAQ, the
users guide and note in the release notes this change).

Rob

- Raw text -