Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <08cd01c143f0$09b16fc0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <20010922201928 DOT A21633 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: New getopt.c has different behavior -- should it? Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:24:36 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2001 05:32:37.0192 (UTC) FILETIME=[277F5480:01C143F1] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:19 AM Subject: New getopt.c has different behavior -- should it? > The new getopt.c that I just added to winsup/cygwin/lib exhibts different, > more GNU-like behavior when it parses arguments. > ... > So, the question is, which way *should* it be? I'm inclined to leave > it the way it is, since it seems to be more gnu-like but I don't > want to cause people problems or generate unnecessary cygwin email > traffic. This is one of the GNUism's that I'm very neutral on. As for the mailing list, I think we can count on one hand - in unary - the number of folk that aren't on the dev list, that run strace. So I don't think there will be much traffic :}. (That is, as long as we update the FAQ, the users guide and note in the release notes this change). Rob