Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:12:21 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited
Message-ID:	<20010901191221.A8749@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010901174955 DOT A7959 AT redhat DOT com> <999385889 DOT 8652 DOT 14 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<999385889.8652.14.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 09:11:29AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On 01 Sep 2001 17:49:55 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If anyone is around on this holiday weekend (for the US, anyway), I'd
>> appreciate it if you could take a look at the cygwin announcement below
>> and add any necessary words.  I wasn't clear on the details of some
>> of the changes, particularly Robert's pthread changes and Corinna's
>> ntsec stuff.
>
>I think you covered it properly :}. There were sme nasty bugs in 1.3.2,
>and there are still some known issues. But nothing worth talking about
>by name IMO.

Really?  Ok.  That's fine.

I think the only other person that I really need to hear from is Corinna.
I'm sure that the ntsec changes are new, exciting, and visible.

cgf

- Raw text -