Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 19:12:21 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 1.3.3 announcment -- extra words solicited Message-ID: <20010901191221.A8749@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010901174955 DOT A7959 AT redhat DOT com> <999385889 DOT 8652 DOT 14 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <999385889.8652.14.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 09:11:29AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >On 01 Sep 2001 17:49:55 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> If anyone is around on this holiday weekend (for the US, anyway), I'd >> appreciate it if you could take a look at the cygwin announcement below >> and add any necessary words. I wasn't clear on the details of some >> of the changes, particularly Robert's pthread changes and Corinna's >> ntsec stuff. > >I think you covered it properly :}. There were sme nasty bugs in 1.3.2, >and there are still some known issues. But nothing worth talking about >by name IMO. Really? Ok. That's fine. I think the only other person that I really need to hear from is Corinna. I'm sure that the ntsec changes are new, exciting, and visible. cgf