Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2001/08/15/22:20:32
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:54:12PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:
Chuck,
I'm not sure that all of this 2.5* stuff is necessary.
If/when I check this in, I'll be using autoconf 2.13, so when you check
things out you'll get the version that I built.
I think that is what we should be testing.
I agree that upgrading libiberty to 2.5x is a good idea but it isn't
something that cygwin people have to worry about.
cgf
>> Index: aclocal.m4
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/aclocal.m4,v
>> retrieving revision 1.4
>> diff -u -r1.4 aclocal.m4
>> --- aclocal.m4 2001/03/06 18:27:14 1.4
>> +++ aclocal.m4 2001/08/15 18:39:34
>> @@ -99,7 +129,7 @@
>> test -z "$CC" && AC_MSG_ERROR([no acceptable cc found in \$PATH])
>> fi
>>
>> -AC_PROG_CC_GNU
>> +_AC_LANG_COMPILER_GNU
>
>
>Dang. That should be "MY_CC_GNU" not "_AC_LANG_COMPILER_GNU". Okay,
>I'm off to double check that my changes still work on 2.52 *with* this
>correction. (Earnie, can you manually change this line in your test, as
>well?)
>
>>
>> if test $ac_cv_prog_gcc = yes; then
>> GCC=yes
>> @@ -110,7 +140,7 @@
>
>--Chuck
>
--
cgf AT cygnus DOT com Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/
- Raw text -