Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:15:44 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Does CVS build?
Message-ID: <20010815221544.A18387@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010815132450 DOT A1468 AT dothill DOT com> <3B7AEC05 DOT 7FBF0C8C AT yahoo DOT com> <20010815155157 DOT B20199 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815162916 DOT A28118 AT redhat DOT com> <20010815171031 DOT A29030 AT redhat DOT com> <3B7AE8D7 DOT 7050508 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7AFEF9 DOT 8070400 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7B2581 DOT 9090904 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3B7B27C4 DOT 9000506 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3B7B27C4.9000506@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:54:12PM -0400

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:54:12PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:

Chuck,
I'm not sure that all of this 2.5* stuff is necessary.

If/when I check this in, I'll be using autoconf 2.13, so when you check
things out you'll get the version that I built.

I think that is what we should be testing.

I agree that upgrading libiberty to 2.5x is a good idea but it isn't
something that cygwin people have to worry about.

cgf

>> Index: aclocal.m4
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/aclocal.m4,v
>> retrieving revision 1.4
>> diff -u -r1.4 aclocal.m4
>> --- aclocal.m4	2001/03/06 18:27:14	1.4
>> +++ aclocal.m4	2001/08/15 18:39:34
>> @@ -99,7 +129,7 @@
>>    test -z "$CC" && AC_MSG_ERROR([no acceptable cc found in \$PATH])
>>  fi
>>  
>> -AC_PROG_CC_GNU
>> +_AC_LANG_COMPILER_GNU
>
>
>Dang.  That should be "MY_CC_GNU" not "_AC_LANG_COMPILER_GNU".  Okay, 
>I'm off to double check that my changes still work on 2.52 *with* this 
>correction.  (Earnie, can you manually change this line in your test, as 
>well?)
>
>>  
>>  if test $ac_cv_prog_gcc = yes; then
>>    GCC=yes
>> @@ -110,7 +140,7 @@
>
>--Chuck
>

-- 
cgf AT cygnus DOT com                        Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/